Search

Sarah England

year-end
48 matches · 13W–35L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Sarah England to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-04-26 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Yenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Yenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Patty O'Connell / Becky Head
2026-03-08 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Haikal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Haikal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
W
2025-11-16 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oksana Cottone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-09 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Scherrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Scherrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-10-05 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Haikal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-07 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cris Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-09-08 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Yenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-15 · Criner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Ebert Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-1
W
2024-03-24 · Criner/Albrecht (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Criner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.4% of games
4.0
21.2%
7W–26L · 40.6% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova