← Search

Mike King

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sylvania, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 155W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history217 matches
W
2026-10-31 · NWO 7.5M Combo Keating/Miller-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Walbolt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · NWO 8.5M King/Dominiak-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Steven Eilert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · NWO 7.5M Combo Keating/Miller-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Walbolt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-04 · NWO 8.5M King/Dominiak-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Steven Eilert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-03 · NWO 7.5M Combo Keating/Miller-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Walbolt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · NWO 7.5M Combo Keating/Miller-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Walbolt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · NWO 18&Over 9.0MX Pacella-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Morgan Connors mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Majdalani-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Majdalani championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Majdalani-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Majdalani championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Majdalani-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Spencer Georgetti
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Majdalani-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zenonn Zaleski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Majdalani-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Gargas
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
85.7%
24W–4L · 67.6% of games
4.5
60.7%
37W–24L · 52.5% of games
7.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 61% of games
8.5
70.6%
24W–10L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
64.1%
25W–14L · 52.2% of games
9.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#1 Singles
11%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe