← Search

Sheila Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Peoria, AZ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 31W–6L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history37 matches
W
Default
2026-04-01 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-28 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Barnett
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-03 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Barnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-03-20 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheila Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-03-06 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Bannister
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-03-01 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Barnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-01-31 · PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65&O/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Barnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-12-06 · 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Myres
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-11-29 · 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Myres
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-11-15 · 8.0 SRP AbrahamSpeller W65F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-04-12 · 8.0 PTC AbrahamSpeller W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Welsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2023-03-24 · 8.0 PTC AbrahamSpeller W65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carole Sharp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
80.6%
25W–6L · 63.6% of games
9.0
100%
6W–0L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal