← Search

Catherine Nicholson Parker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
El Paso, TX
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history50 matches
W
2026-10-24 · GEPTA/65&over/7.0W/Orozco/TW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucy Pfirman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-10 · GEPTA/65&over/7.0W/Orozco/TW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucy Pfirman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-10-03 · GEPTA/65&over/7.0W/Orozco/TW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thelma Campos
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · GEPTA/65&over/7.0W/Orozco/TW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Viramontes
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · GEPTA/65&over/7.0W/Orozco/TW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Viramontes
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Viramontes/TW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Viramontes
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-21 · GEPTA/65&over/8.0W/Pfirman/EPTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Gomez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-09-30 · GEPTA/65&over/8.0W/Pfirman/EPTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Goldfarb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-09 · GEPTA/65&over/8.0W/Pfirman/EPTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Belle Middagh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-02 · GEPTA/65&over/8.0W/Pfirman/EPTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lucy Pfirman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-10-16 · GEPTA/Pfirman/65&over/8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Goldfarb
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-10-09 · GEPTA/Pfirman/65&over/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Goldfarb
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 53% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.3% of games
8.0
50%
10W–10L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams