Teams

TTC Zimmer Spring

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Spring-Weeknight 18&over · 3.0 Adult Women - Weeknight

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-17vs NR- CanterburyLost 12
L#1 DoublesOlivia Outlaw / Pamela Welbourne vs Pasquale Tosyali / Morgan Smyth1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Bristow / Gina Simpson vs Sarah Amick / Addie Akins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Amy Taylor vs Linda Canterbury / Erin Swann6-7, 3-6
2025-02-17vs NR- CanterburyWon 31
W#1 DoublesAshlyn Cash / Lynn Zimmer vs Alison Phillips / Kelli Kitchens6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Anderson vs Pasquale Tosyali6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesOlivia Outlaw / Lisa Bristow vs Morgan Smyth / Addie Akins3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRiley ORear / Debra Burroughs vs Linda Canterbury / Erin Swann3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women - Weeknight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Ashlyn Cash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Taylor Baggett
published
2.85
Olivia Outlaw
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Lynn Zimmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Amanda Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Gina Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Lisa Bristow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Allison Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.58
Pamela Welbourne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Debra Burroughs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.18
Riley ORear
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashlyn Cash + Olivia Outlaw3259% games+6.8% vs expected
Allison Anderson + Debra Burroughs123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Bristow + Gina Simpson303 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Zimmer + Taylor Baggett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashlyn Cash
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Taylor Baggett
30W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
Olivia Outlaw
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Lynn Zimmer
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Amanda Arnold
11W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Gina Simpson
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Lisa Bristow
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Allison Anderson
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.59
Pamela Welbourne
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Debra Burroughs
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Riley ORear
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.