Teams

SA Slammers

2026 40 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.0 Flight

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · Ladies 3.0 Flight
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1San Angelo - Slice Girls000000
2SA Slammers000000
3Harlingen-Overserved000000
4NOHO - Serves You Right000000
5Corpus-Racquettes000000
6Corpus-Dolls with Balls000000
7San Antonio - Fireballs000000
8Fair Oaks Ranch-Love Me Not000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Joan Millwater
published
2.95
KATHERINE GILLIGAN
published
2.95
Carolyn Janse
published 3
2.94
Deborah Lange
published 3
2.93
Tressa Trayhan
published
2.93
Belinda Canonico
published 3
2.92
Kelly Outlaw
published
2.90
Belinda Cross
published 3
2.86
Miranda Hoffpauir
published
2.85
Hollie Green
published 3
2.22
Cecilia Sanchez
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tressa Trayhan + Deborah Lange4256% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Outlaw + Tressa Trayhan134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Outlaw + KATHERINE GILLIGAN404 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Janse + Tressa Trayhan404 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Canonico + Hollie Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joan Millwater
41W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
KATHERINE GILLIGAN
20W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Carolyn Janse
17W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Deborah Lange
27W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
Tressa Trayhan
21W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Belinda Canonico
36W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
Kelly Outlaw
27W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Belinda Cross
19W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
Miranda Hoffpauir
9W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Hollie Green
16W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
2.5
Cecilia Sanchez
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.