Teams

Robinson/LR/Reb

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs Junior/LR/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Bultena / Manda Wood vs Cindy Golden / Melanie Bobo2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Staggs / Wendy Lynch vs Anita Junior / CARMEN RICE6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShelly Baron / Sue Rowland vs Laura Feng / Lydia Hunjan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-29vs Oates/ARVTA/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelaney Gee / Deanna Garretson vs Rebecca Kinworthy / Jennifer Fielding3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Melissa Oates / Ellie Karvoski2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Crow / Vanesa Wood vs Amy Neumeier / Leslie Lamb5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-21vs Breaker/Stanford/LR/BPWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelaney Gee / Elaine Bultena vs Bernadette Stanford / Caroline Howse6-7, 2-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Wendy Lynch vs Robin Swede / Amy Armond6-3, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Crow / Vanesa Wood vs Kris Sims / Stefan Jones6-0, 6-1
2025-07-17vs DWayne/Jacksonville/BurnsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Staggs / Melaney Gee vs Chyrel Henry / Stephanie Blair7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Manda Wood vs Cheryl Johnson / Debra Nathaniel6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShelly Baron / Vanesa Wood vs Debra Wayne / Rhonda Gray4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-09vs Altrui/Kiker/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeanna Garretson / Elaine Bultena vs Pam Landis / Melanie Kiker0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKim Worrell / Kathy Robinson vs Susan Altrui / Cornelia Lea6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSue Rowland / Vanesa Wood vs Lori Shepard / Stephanie Petray6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-01vs Junior/LR/OCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Worrell / Melaney Gee vs Margaret Hicks / Melanie Bobo3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesManda Wood / Wendy Lynch vs CARMEN RICE / Anita Junior3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVanesa Wood / Allyson Hendrix vs Angele Forrest / Erin Cosse2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Katie Staggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Wendy Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Melaney Gee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Deanna Garretson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Elaine Bultena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Kim Worrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Jennifer Crow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Manda Wood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Sue Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Allyson Hendrix
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Vanesa Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Baron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Worrell + Melaney Gee3453% games−0.2% vs expected
Katie Staggs + Elaine Bultena123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Staggs + Wendy Lynch123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Staggs + Melaney Gee123 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Bultena + Manda Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Staggs
22W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Wendy Lynch
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Melaney Gee
29W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Elaine Bultena
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kim Worrell
32W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Jennifer Crow
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Manda Wood
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sue Rowland
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Allyson Hendrix
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Vanesa Wood
8W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Shelly Baron
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.