Teams

CTL18/Beall/CTC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - USTA · 18 & Over Mixed 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Angie Rucker
published 4.5
4.32
Andrew Hershelman
published 4.5
4.24
Justin Rodgers
published
4.01
Elle Klein
published 4
3.90
Allie Boland
published 4
3.84
Andrew Kaczynski
published 4
3.81
Daniel Goolsby
published 4
3.75
Michael Beall
published
3.69
Joshua Estes
published
3.68
Shannon Goolsby
published
3.63
Monica Gaddis
published
3.59
Catherine Lesser
published 4
3.49
Jeremy Pow
published
3.32
Raine Cherry
published
3.31
Amy Beall
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Beall + Michael Beall1449% gamesnot enough data
Amy Beall + Daniel Goolsby213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Goolsby + Elle Klein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Rucker
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Andrew Hershelman
46W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Justin Rodgers
52W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Elle Klein
36W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Allie Boland
75W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Andrew Kaczynski
42W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Daniel Goolsby
39W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Michael Beall
33W–39L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Joshua Estes
27W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Shannon Goolsby
25W–24L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Monica Gaddis
49W–39L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Catherine Lesser
77W–72L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Jeremy Pow
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Raine Cherry
32W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
4
Amy Beall
63W–37L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.