Teams

USTA Campus-Ortiz

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 18 & Over - Summer Night · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-11vs USTA Campus-SandersLost 12
L#1 DoublesLarisa Mikhalochkina / Maria Jessica Jocson vs Annette Burkett / Leslie Sanders3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAnn Schneider / Ixia Ortiz vs Marie George / Irina Jacobs6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMadeleine Revelles / Justine Tigno-Aranjuez vs Susan Cogswell / Ashley Edlund7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-10vs USTA Campus-SandersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Jean Chisholm / Anna Soloveychik vs Marilyn Rankin / Karin Hammond6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarisa Mikhalochkina / Sarah Marcovich vs April Filer / Marie George4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYounhee Chung Cho / Esther Flores vs Ashley Edlund / Farah Van Deering6-1, 6-2
2026-07-28vs USTA Campus-SandersLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Jean Chisholm / Ixia Ortiz vs Jody MacKenzie / Farah Van Deering6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesYounhee Chung Cho / Sarah Marcovich vs Leslie Sanders / Aylin Ozyurek1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCierra Woods / Madeleine Revelles vs Lisbeth Conner / Karin Hammond6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-26vs USTA Campus-SandersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJustine Tigno-Aranjuez / Sandra Jackson vs Monica Bonilla / Jasmine Lopez-screen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Schneider / Ixia Ortiz vs April Filer / Sue Ventura6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCierra Woods / Sarah Marcovich vs Leslie Sanders / Aylin Ozyurek1-6, 3-6
2026-07-24vs USTA Campus-SandersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Jean Chisholm / Sandra Jackson vs Monica Bonilla / Mariko Ford6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Schneider / Anna Soloveychik vs Irina Jacobs / Susan Cogswell6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJustine Tigno-Aranjuez / Esther Flores vs Lisbeth Conner / Marie George2-6, 2-6
2026-07-22vs USTA Campus-SandersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustine Tigno-Aranjuez / Anna Soloveychik vs Jody MacKenzie / Susan Cogswell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Schneider / Sandra Jackson vs Marilyn Rankin / Jasmine Lopez-screen5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesYounhee Chung Cho / Madeleine Revelles vs April Filer / Karin Hammond1-6, 2-6
2026-06-23vs USTA Campus-SandersLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandra Jackson / Cierra Woods vs Annette Burkett / Ashley Edlund6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIxia Ortiz / Justine Tigno-Aranjuez vs Sue Ventura / Leslie Sanders4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Jessica Jocson / Ann Schneider vs Jasmine Lopez-screen / Ke Li1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Mary Jean Chisholm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Cierra Woods
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Larisa Mikhalochkina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Sandra Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Sarah Marcovich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Justine Tigno-Aranjuez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Esther Flores
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Anna Soloveychik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Maria Jessica Jocson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Ixia Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Madeleine Revelles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Younhee Chung Cho
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Jackson + Younhee Chung Cho213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jean Chisholm
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Cierra Woods
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Larisa Mikhalochkina
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Sandra Jackson
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Sarah Marcovich
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Justine Tigno-Aranjuez
13W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Esther Flores
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anna Soloveychik
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Maria Jessica Jocson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Ixia Ortiz
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Madeleine Revelles
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Younhee Chung Cho
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.