Teams

DB - Rodriguez-Jewell

2024 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.94 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-24vs Alachua/Fox/40&Over3.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesIryna Zasimovich vs Cameron Rosenthal6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Engemann / Charlene Krueger vs Jennifer Gerling / Valerie Atohi3-6, 4-6
2024-05-19vs Hawkstone - CrossSplit 11
W#1 SinglesIryna Zasimovich vs Chiara de Gennaro5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlene Krueger / Isabel Zadezensky vs Sriyani Dissanayake / Wanda Cross3-6, 3-6
2024-05-05vs JTC Johnson-ZaldivarLost 01
L#3 DoublesIsabel Zadezensky / Charlene Krueger vs Tiffany Schmidt / Maria Zaldivar4-6, 5-7
2024-04-28vs 300 - Pauly/CarlsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Rodriguez / Iryna Zasimovich vs Camille Pauly / Cara Duffaut3-6, 3-6
2024-04-21vs Alachua/Fox/40&Over3.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesIryna Zasimovich vs Jennifer Gerling2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Engemann / Charlene Krueger vs Danielle McGriff / Maureen Ratliff2-6, 4-6
2024-04-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Flowers / Charlene Krueger vs Lisa King / Sandra Werbel1-6, 1-6
2024-03-17vs 300 - Pauly/CarlsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharlene Krueger / Heather Jewell vs Della Tuten / MARY K WIMSETT2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Iryna Zasimovich
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Terry Rodriguez
published
2.82
Heather Jewell
published 3
2.77
Diane Adkins
published 3
Andrea Wiechmann
published 3
Anne Engemann
published 3
2.70
Diana Butler
published 3
2.54
2.30
Charlene Krueger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Libby Prince
published
Michaela Hogan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Iryna Zasimovich
52W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.06
Terry Rodriguez
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Heather Jewell
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Diane Adkins
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrea Wiechmann
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Anne Engemann
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Diana Butler
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Isabel Zadezensky
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Charlene Krueger
5W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.30
Libby Prince
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michaela Hogan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.