Teams

4.5 women

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14.5 women000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Courteney Park
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.35
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Amber Brightly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Arantxa White
published 4.5
4.23
Andrea Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.81
Christianne Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Monica Schmidt
published
Sophia Adamson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vianka Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Adamson + Andrea Adamson9057% games+2.9% vs expected
Sophia Adamson + Monica Schmidt6071% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Adamson + Monica Schmidt5067% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Adamson + Courteney Park5073% gamesnot enough data
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez + Courteney Park5066% gamesnot enough data
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez + Monica Schmidt314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courteney Park
71W–17L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Alehanna Kehr- Gomez
42W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Amber Brightly
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Arantxa White
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Andrea Adamson
36W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Christianne Alvarez
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Monica Schmidt
37W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sophia Adamson
36W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vianka Sanchez
67W–50L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.