Teams

Greenhill/Pham WS Open

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · WS Open

13 players · average NTRP 4.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-23vs LifeTime Frisco/Vo-Nguyen WS OPENLost 02
L#1 DoublesFranchel Krueger / Kelly Woods vs Erica Vo / Kristin Rose3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLynh Pham vs Julie Gibson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-02vs LifeTime Frisco/Vo-Nguyen WS OPENLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaudia Clancy / Lisa Pryce vs Janessa Wilson / Wilson Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlisa Bennett vs Laura Hornbach2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKrista Carlson / Lynh Pham vs Maria Lopez / Astrid Perez0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-17vs LifeTime Frisco/Vo-Nguyen WS OPENLost 12
W#1 DoublesFranchel Krueger / Kelly Woods vs Melissa Hanold / Katy O'Neil6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAudra Hopper vs Deb Nguyen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalia Prinz / Claudia Clancy vs Kristin Rose / Janessa Wilson3-6, 4-6
2025-02-02vs LifeTime Frisco/Vo-Nguyen WS OPENLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaudia Clancy / Lisa Pryce vs Laura Hornbach / Erica Vo3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlisa Bennett vs Deb Nguyen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Latimer / Holly Kerr vs Julie Gibson / Melissa Hanold6-4, 6-4
2025-01-19vs LifeTime Frisco/Vo-Nguyen WS OPENLost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Kerr / Kelly Woods vs Wilson Johnson / Astrid Perez1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAudra Hopper vs Maria Lopez1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLynh Pham / Franchel Krueger vs Katy O'Neil / Deb Nguyen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WS Open have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alisa Bennett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.44
Claudia Clancy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.29
Kelly Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Audra Hopper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Franchel Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Krista Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Lynh Pham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.13
Jennifer Latimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Holly Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Natalia Prinz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Pryce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mercedes Fernandez
published
Patricia Zerdan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynh Pham + Krista Carlson4343% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Clancy + Lisa Pryce134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alisa Bennett
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Claudia Clancy
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.44
Kelly Woods
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.29
4.5
Audra Hopper
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Franchel Krueger
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.23
Krista Carlson
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.22
Lynh Pham
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.18
Jennifer Latimer
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Holly Kerr
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Natalia Prinz
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.83
Lisa Pryce
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mercedes Fernandez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Zerdan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.