Teams

THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.32 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Christin Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.26
Lisa Howlett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Heather Edwards
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Laura Shier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Dolores Corley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.11
Margo Yohner
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
3.11
Anne Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Adrienne Dedelow
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christin Harrington
80W–35L career
0%59%42%
3.58
3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–96L career
0%91%9%
3.45
3.5
Lisa Howlett
31W–21L career · type S
5%91%4%
3.26
3.5
Heather Edwards
94W–67L career · type A
1%99%0%
3.22
3.5
Laura Shier
22W–55L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3.5
Dolores Corley
74W–61L career
8%92%0%
3.14
3
Margo Yohner
71W–57L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3.5
Anne Nichols
0W–4L career · type S
20%79%1%
3.11
3
Adrienne Dedelow
35W–35L career
0%57%43%
3.08
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.