Teams

King Penguins

2021 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.46 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-07-18vs Nicholson 9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Elizabeth Larson vs Kareen Whiteley / Dean Packard6-3, 6-4
2021-07-11vs Nicholson 9.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLeonard Tetteh / Sarah Monsheimer vs Marianne Lee / Al Baker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesButhaina Shukri / Tom Lusby vs Robert Nuscher / Tatiana Loboda5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Larson
published 5
4.68
Heather Herman
published 5
4.31
Leonard Tetteh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Gabrielle Cha
published 4.5
4.23
Christine Becer
published 4.5
4.15
Sarah Monsheimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Henry Cha
published 4.5
4.04
Jean Lim
published
4.00
Marla LaHaye
published 4.5
3.96
Buthaina Shukri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
David Trang
published 4.5
3.75
Justin Cady
published
3.59
Tom Lusby
published
3.25
James Appel
published 3.5
Meghan Damico
published
Samuel Borchers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henry Cha + Jean Lim4940% games−4.6% vs expected
Heather Herman + Justin Cady033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elizabeth Larson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
5
Heather Herman
14W–7L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.68
4.5
Leonard Tetteh
338W–208L career · 1 line in 2021
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Gabrielle Cha
4W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Christine Becer
271W–177L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Sarah Monsheimer
45W–80L career · 1 line in 2021
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Henry Cha
25W–50L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.04
Jean Lim
18W–38L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Marla LaHaye
63W–84L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
4.00
4.5
Buthaina Shukri
42W–81L career · 1 line in 2021
64%36%<1%
3.96
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4.5
David Trang
0W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.85
Justin Cady
27W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Tom Lusby
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
James Appel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Meghan Damico
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Samuel Borchers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.