Teams

USTA Atlanta/Karen Bart

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Central Park (Allison Hill)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesShelly Hunt / Wendy Haymond vs Allison Hill / Suzanne Fries6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Bart / Katharine Magahey vs Liz Barwig / Jackie Homan6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDori Blanchard / Nancy Tate vs Darla Light / Jane Ritter7-5, 6-3
2026-02-17vs Rock Springs (Tricia Morgan)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Tate / Wendy Haymond vs Cindy Weidinger / Terri Denmark6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Bart / Shelly Hunt vs Mary Saye / Christina Schultze6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatharine Magahey / Kay Forrest vs Melissa Hinson / Patricia Morgan6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCheryl Russell / Sandra Williams vs Bea Kay Freeh / Susan McCall6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShelly Hunt / Wendy Haymond vs Deborah Heald / Elizabeth Ostapiuk4-6, 6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDori Blanchard / Nancy Tate vs Elket Swope / Kimberly Lindsey6-4, 6-1
2026-01-28vs Central Park (Allison Hill)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Bart / Shelly Hunt vs Allison Hill / Jackie Homan5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Russell / Katharine Magahey vs Darla Light / Jane Ritter2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Tate / Dori Blanchard vs Bobbie Gail Simpson / Gina Gibb4-6, 6-0, 6-2
2026-01-21vs Rock Springs (Tricia Morgan)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Russell / Shelly Hunt vs Debbie Frey / Christina Schultze6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Tate / Sandra Williams vs Cindy Weidinger / Cheryl DeLuca-Johnson6-7, 6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKatharine Magahey / Kay Forrest vs Melissa Hinson / Marcia Coley6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCheryl Russell / Katharine Magahey vs Deborah Heald / Bea Kay Freeh6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Bart / Shelly Hunt vs Susan McCall / Anna Alvarez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Tate / Dori Blanchard vs Tiki Bicknell / Gretchen Schulz6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Karen Bart511627122
2Edenwilde (Monica Malires)*5115310149
3South Fulton (Susan Dickey)*5114411154
4Overlook (Robin Wilkinson)*5113513148
5Rockdale TC (Nancy Newman)*4212614139
6Dekalb TC (Amy Smith)*3310819165
7Lost Mountain (Mary Kang)*3310819176
8Central Park (Allison Hill)*3310821205
9Peachtree Station (Deborah Heald)*3381023173
10Sibley Forest (Sara Bertino)*1571124207
11CC of Roswell (Gisele Dolan)*1531532228
12Rock Springs (Tricia Morgan)*1521632223
13Sandy Springs RC (Margaret Staats)*1521633235
14South Fulton (Cindy Robertson)*1521633203
15Wynbrooke (Icilma Morton)*0631531224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Shelly Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Katharine Magahey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.97
Wendy Haymond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Nancy Tate
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.92
Dori Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Kristan Stroner
published
3.89
Karen Bart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
Kay Forrest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Kristine Fitts
published 4
3.69
Cheryl Russell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Sandra Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Tate + Dori Blanchard12166% games+10.0% vs expected
Karen Bart + Katharine Magahey6068% games+9.9% vs expected
Katharine Magahey + Kay Forrest7173% games+7.7% vs expected
Karen Bart + Shelly Hunt15463% games+1.5% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Dori Blanchard14756% games+1.3% vs expected
Kristan Stroner + Nancy Tate16366% games+0.7% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Kay Forrest12459% games+0.3% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Katharine Magahey4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelly Hunt
45W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.08
Katharine Magahey
31W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
Wendy Haymond
46W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Nancy Tate
84W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Dori Blanchard
53W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Kristan Stroner
61W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Karen Bart
61W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Kay Forrest
35W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Kristine Fitts
116W–56L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cheryl Russell
67W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Sandra Williams
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.