Teams

JVarn (Palisades)

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 9.0 - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-27vs RWang (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKeenan Ahern / Callie Schmit vs Sean Carmean / Elizabeth Heald4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Varn / Brian Mogelefsky vs Rei Wang / Jennifer Antoszyk6-2, 6-3
2022-07-06vs ESutker (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Varn / Brian Mogelefsky vs Melissa Lyles / Alex Kiser6-7, 2-6
2022-06-22vs RRanadive (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Mogelefsky / Jordan Bowers vs Cecilia Drake / Alex Salazar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Varn / Keenan Ahern vs Anatoly Zelepouga / Melissa Potier3-6, 0-6
2022-06-15vs JGoldblatt (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Mogelefsky / Jessica Varn vs Ashley Shaw / Elisabeth Drake6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-08vs RWang (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRex Varn / Callie Schmit vs Quinn Carmean / Jennifer Antoszyk3-6, 1-6
2022-06-01vs ABacalja (Ballantyne Country Club)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKeenan Ahern / Callie Schmit vs Alfonso Bacalja / Hirangi Mukhi3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Varn / Brian Mogelefsky vs Christopher Fain / Pierina Imparato2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 9.0 - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Callie Schmit
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.39
4.26
Jessica Varn
published 4.5
4.25
Brian Mogelefsky
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Hans Nelissen
published 4.5
3.79
Keenan Ahern
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.68
Meaghan Ahern
published 4
Jordan Bowers
published
Lindsay Morrison
published
Rex Varn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Varn + Brian Mogelefsky6165% games+13.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Callie Schmit
60W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.58
4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
46W–31L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Jessica Varn
51W–32L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Brian Mogelefsky
61W–36L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Hans Nelissen
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Keenan Ahern
28W–32L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Meaghan Ahern
47W–45L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Jordan Bowers
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Morrison
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rex Varn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.