Teams

Thongphok 6.5 Combo

2023 Frederick Combo · Frederick Combo 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-30vs Smash GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Erdely / Miki Reed vs Jodi Hathaway / Jennifer Willie7-6, 7-5
2023-09-11vs TiebreakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Karen Coyne vs Lesley Leonard / Amy LaMoure5-7, 2-6
2023-09-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarina Villagra / Karen Coyne vs Kelly Temple / Donna Jones7-6, 4-5
2023-09-02vs Smash GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesHolly Erdely / Sandy Thongphok vs Mary Beth Herrera / Erika Gilbert6-3, 6-0
2023-08-08vs TiebreakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Coyne / Sabina Spicher vs Kristy Sullivan / MIchelle Jeram6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Eliza Green
published 3.5
3.18
Carina Villagra
published 3.5
3.17
Nikki Eyman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Laura McNay
published
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.10
Joanna Woessner
published
3.08
Holly Erdely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Coyne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kathleen Maiden
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Miki Reed
published
2.88
Carrie Derse
published 3
2.76
Julie McConnell
published
2.61
Robin Dickerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Dodson + Carina Villagra134 matchesnot enough data
Laura Haney + Sandy Thongphok303 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Maiden + Nikki Eyman213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Coyne + Holly Erdely033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.56
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Eliza Green
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carina Villagra
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Nikki Eyman
233W–188L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
Laura McNay
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Joanna Woessner
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.10
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Karen Coyne
62W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Kathleen Maiden
106W–188L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
Miki Reed
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Carrie Derse
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Julie McConnell
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Robin Dickerson
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.