Teams

CACI GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs PRKR GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCherie Weaver / Holly Kortum vs Denise Dickson / Joey Rothman6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSomsi Stringer / Stacey Anderson vs Brenda Amundsen / Heidi Pennink4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-31vs VCC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Rose / Somsi Stringer vs Dana Henry / Kelly Kelly7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Kortum / Cherie Weaver vs Holly Flora / Theresa Holyer6-2, 6-0
2023-08-24vs PCRK NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Rose / Somsi Stringer vs Mary Ingolia / Julie Whipple6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJodi Little / Cherie Weaver vs Christine Aberle / Ginny Haensel1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-17vs RRTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Rose / Somsi Stringer vs Michelle Havard / Traci Heffron3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-10vs HRCA-S GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCherie Weaver / Holly Kortum vs Lara Callas / Elaine Gailloux2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Anderson / Somsi Stringer vs Courtney Carignan / Kelli Lofquist6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-03vs PRC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Kortum / Cherie Weaver vs Shawn Blackwood / Stephanie Gresh1-6, 2-6
2023-07-27vs SS-LT PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCherie Weaver / Holly Kortum vs Monica Greenfield / Michelle Millet6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Angela Rose
published 4
3.86
Holly Kortum
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Cherie Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Jodi Little
published
3.69
Somsi Stringer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Nola Nelson
published
Megan Salinas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Weaver + Holly Kortum674554% games+1.4% vs expected
Somsi Stringer + Angela Rose151050% games−1.2% vs expected
Somsi Stringer + Holly Kortum2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Rose
32W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Holly Kortum
139W–98L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Cherie Weaver
77W–58L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Jodi Little
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Somsi Stringer
112W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Nola Nelson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Megan Salinas
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.