Teams

El.Merritt18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-30vs Ju.Liddle18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Lee Veit vs Vanese Clough / Sharon Fred5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Uthe / Yvonne Barrow vs Takako Schenberger / Julie Liddle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-09vs Sh.Brodsgaard18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Glenn / Alison Uthe vs Stacey Giglio / Jennifer Kazmierczak3-6, 6-7
2024-08-26vs Ma.Gonella18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Alison Uthe vs Denise Turner / Kelly Day5-7, 2-6
2024-08-19vs Ch.Byrum18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Uthe / Lee Veit vs Toni Paladino / Laura Bell6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesYvonne Barrow / Settle Monroe vs Lora Barnett / Dorothy Nance6-3, 7-5
2024-08-12vs Ap.Taylor18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSettle Monroe / Allison Sheehan vs April Taylor / Mallory Biringer4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Alison Uthe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Ashley Gaylord
published 3.5
3.31
Lee Veit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Allison Glenn
published 3.5
3.29
Chase Felmet
published 3.5
3.29
Allison Sheehan
published 3.5
3.25
Settle Monroe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Julie Coyne
published
3.19
Yvonne Barrow
published
3.06
Parker Wright
published
3.00
Lauren Bean
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Glenn + Allison Sheehan4347% games+1.4% vs expected
Lee Veit + Alison Uthe3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Uthe
76W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ashley Gaylord
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Lee Veit
83W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Allison Glenn
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Chase Felmet
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Allison Sheehan
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Settle Monroe
65W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Julie Coyne
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Yvonne Barrow
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Parker Wright
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lauren Bean
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.