Teams

Shumway - Compass Pointe

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Men 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-20vs MEISSNER/WILSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesFranklin Cassada / David Paul vs Dean Wilson / Michael Consoletti6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Hancock / Jim Ferris vs Jeff Walker / Thomas Miller7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBarry Barsamian / David Gwinn vs Jim Rich / Mike Katz3-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs nguyen/williamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Hancock / David Paul vs Hiep Nguyen / Steve Kim6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Svenconis / David Gwinn vs Son Nguyen / Clarence Smith6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFranklin Cassada / Jim Ferris vs Edward Everett / Robert Pelosi6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Franklin Cassada
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
BRUCE MILLER
published 3.5
3.38
Michael Droulette
published
3.34
Joseph Kugler
published
3.26
Barry Barsamian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kevin Svenconis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
David Paul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Jim Ferris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
David Beardsell
published 3
Daniel Shumway
published 3
2.74
Bruce Alter
published 3
2.68
David Gwinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Ferris + Franklin Cassada5268% games+12.3% vs expected
BRUCE MILLER + Michael Droulette4255% games−3.4% vs expected
Michael Droulette + Franklin Cassada314 matchesnot enough data
Franklin Cassada + David Paul314 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Kugler + Kevin Svenconis303 matchesnot enough data
BRUCE MILLER + David Paul303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Franklin Cassada
51W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
BRUCE MILLER
22W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Michael Droulette
21W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Joseph Kugler
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Barry Barsamian
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Kevin Svenconis
19W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
David Paul
20W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Jim Ferris
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
David Beardsell
11W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Daniel Shumway
0W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Bruce Alter
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
David Gwinn
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.