Teams

SDNC 3.5 Santaluz Club/ Anderson

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles WE · GNO- SDNC

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-12vs SDNC 3.5 Rancho Del Oro/ WalkerLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Flores / Arash Rassoulpour vs Corey Jung / Praveen Reddy Mallu1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Lindsey / Brian Hays vs Scott Tilton / Keith Omsberg2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlireza Khansari / Robert Meyer vs Kenichi Chihara / Luis Leung5-7, 3-6
2025-10-05vs SDNC 3.5 Crosby Club/ OswaltLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Anderson / Ray Gliner vs Stephen Birtsas / Steve Haayen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJon Doyle / Robert Meyer vs Brian Holm / Payton Moyer1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlireza Khansari / Darren Pfefferman vs Andrew Eaton / Stas Tara5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for GNO- SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Francisco Flores
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Darren Pfefferman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jon Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Patrick Mead
published
3.16
Harold Rosenberg
published 3.5
3.15
Brian Hays
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Ray Gliner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Arash Rassoulpour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Alireza Khansari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.71
Dave Chow
published 3
Saeid Baha
published
Tony Adamo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arash Rassoulpour + Patrick Mead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Francisco Flores
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Darren Pfefferman
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jon Doyle
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
Patrick Mead
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Harold Rosenberg
19W–37L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Brian Hays
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Ray Gliner
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Arash Rassoulpour
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Alireza Khansari
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Dave Chow
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Saeid Baha
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Adamo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.