Teams

300 Tri Deez Netz

2025 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-29vs JTC ZaldivarWon 20
W#1 DoublesBabette Brumback / Samantha Penhale vs Kim Magee / Alison Andrus6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIryna Zasimovich / Katherine Ratliff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-29vs JTC ZaldivarWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamantha Penhale / Stephanie Ryan vs Alison Andrus / Kim Magee3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Mears / Iryna Zasimovich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-28vs Alachua/Neelands/4.0/3.5/3.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusannah Peddie / Samantha Penhale vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Anita Rajasekhar6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Hooghuis / Katherine Ratliff vs Camille Pauly / Caroline Smith2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-23vs Hawks TriForceWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Penhale / Cathy Boon vs Lauren Indelicato / Andrea Love6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennine Brandt / Laurie McLaughlin vs Vicki Guy / Kelly Haager4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Paradise Black / Sarah Hooghuis vs Bailey Lerner / Lauren Holliday6-4, 6-3
2025-03-07vs HCC HawkstoneWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusannah Peddie / Samantha Penhale vs Kelsy Hill / Haesuk Park6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Heather Mears vs Wanda Cross / Cara Duffaut6-4, 6-2
2025-03-01vs DB GerlingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJhanna Gilbert / Sarah Hooghuis vs Valerie Atohi / Amanda Sholty7-6, 6-1
2025-02-15vs Alachua/Neelands/4.0/3.5/3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Penhale / Susannah Peddie vs Julie Sager / Jenny Neelands4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-09vs HCC HawkstoneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindy Archambeau / Jennine Brandt vs Vinata Vedam-Mai / Haesuk Park6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Katherine Ratliff vs Mary Hazan / Hillary Turlington6-0, 6-2
2025-01-25vs Hawks TriForceLost 12
L#1 DoublesBabette Brumback / Jennine Brandt vs Caroline Hord / TARA BROMIRSKI5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Boon / Laurie McLaughlin vs Andrea Love / Mara Rodriguez5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Hooghuis / Katherine Ratliff vs Bailey Lerner / Lauren Holliday6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Samantha Penhale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Cathy Boon
published 3.5
3.56
Tiffany Scalf
published
3.39
Stephanie Ryan
published
3.38
Sarah Hooghuis
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.32
3.28
Lauren Groff
published
3.28
Mary Mccue
published
3.23
Alicia Pfahler
published 3.5
3.15
Laurie McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Lindy Archambeau
published
3.08
Iryna Zasimovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Jhanna Gilbert
published
3.04
Heather Mears
published
2.73
MARY K WIMSETT
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jennine Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Susannah Peddie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennine Brandt + Laurie McLaughlin31041% gamesnot enough data
MARY K WIMSETT + Sarah Hooghuis3253% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Paradise Black + Jhanna Gilbert404 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Hooghuis + Tiffany Scalf314 matchesnot enough data
Laurie McLaughlin + Lindy Archambeau404 matchesnot enough data
MARY K WIMSETT + Laurie McLaughlin123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Mears + Jhanna Gilbert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Samantha Penhale
51W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Cathy Boon
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Tiffany Scalf
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.56
Stephanie Ryan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Sarah Hooghuis
53W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Nicole Paradise Black
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lauren Groff
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Mary Mccue
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Alicia Pfahler
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Laurie McLaughlin
78W–154L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Lindy Archambeau
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Iryna Zasimovich
51W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Jhanna Gilbert
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Heather Mears
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
MARY K WIMSETT
82W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Jennine Brandt
77W–116L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susannah Peddie
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.