Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Jones/ EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Austin Allen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.74
Aram Trejo
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
David Milne
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.45
Cristian Trejo
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
Ismael Arellano Flores
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jesus Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Michel Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Nathan Brown
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Pedro Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Gardea
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Rene Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Roberto Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Kotowski + Nathan Brown31665% games+4.4% vs expected
Rene Herrera + Austin Allen28560% gamesnot enough data
Roberto Diaz + Aram Trejo8752% gamesnot enough data
Jesus Martinez + Michael Kotowski2350% gamesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Aram Trejo224 matchesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Nathan Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin Allen
152W–47L career · 28 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Aram Trejo
29W–25L career · 23 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
3.5
David Milne
26W–3L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Cristian Trejo
22W–12L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Ismael Arellano Flores
21W–12L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesus Martinez
61W–33L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–38L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ VAZQUEZ
12W–3L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
125W–48L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michel Ramirez
7W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nathan Brown
59W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pedro Ibarra
20W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Gardea
13W–12L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rene Herrera
49W–19L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roberto Diaz
24W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.