Teams

KC-RH GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs KC-RH NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesLindsey Morrison / Brooke Wright vs Sandra Copenhaver / Pauline Vargo6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer DHaenens vs Meredith Johnson7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLori Himmel / VIRGINIA WANG vs Carla Minckley / Magdalena Smith6-3, 7-5
2026-07-06vs GR GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Jennifer DHaenens vs Jacki Malone / Tracey Felicidade Jones2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy McFarland vs Kimberly Fekete2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Himmel / VIRGINIA WANG vs Celia Finnegan / Natalie Wurzer7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLindsey Morrison / Lacey McMurry vs Lori Strike / Bonnie Orlowski6-2, 6-1
2026-06-29vs SS-LGT NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Brooke Wright vs Jenni Poulos / Jeni Cuddie4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVIRGINIA WANG / Gina Merrill vs Nicole Poulos / Lindsey McGraw7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Himmel / Lacey McMurry vs Kate Perreault / Lesley Euston3-6, 0-6
2026-06-22vs LEBTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer DHaenens / Lori Himmel vs Natalie Lucero / Kelly Callister3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGina Merrill vs Amber Coe6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy McFarland / VIRGINIA WANG vs Andrea Reinig / Mary Bakken0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLindsey Morrison / Lacey McMurry vs Meghan Page / Kathy Hoskins6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-15vs BM GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Brooke Wright vs Natallia Temnikova Avseev / Amanda Lessmann6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLindsey Morrison vs Nina Sasaki7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer DHaenens / Lacey McMurry vs Abby McFerron / Sarah Pierson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVIRGINIA WANG / Amy McFarland vs Ari Nicholson / Sarah Chapman6-4, 6-0
2026-06-08vs BCST REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / Amy McFarland vs Clara Mizenko / Kimberly Lange6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLacey McMurry vs Colleen Callahan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Morrison / Jennifer DHaenens vs Kathy Owens / Amber Todd6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCandace Sturges / VIRGINIA WANG vs Liz Crowell / Sharon Ehler7-6, 6-4
2026-06-01vs SS-LGT GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrooke Wright / Amy McFarland vs Whitney Yoost / Stacey Williams6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGina Merrill vs Jennifer Moeller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKrystal Joscelyne / VIRGINIA WANG vs Molly Stephens / Jailyn Volok2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCandace Sturges / Lori Himmel vs Mia Bowick / Miki Lorentz6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Amy McFarland
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Jennifer DHaenens
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Gina Merrill
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
VIRGINIA WANG
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.60
Krystal Joscelyne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
Lori Himmel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Brooke Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Lindsey Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.49
Candace Sturges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Lacey McMurry
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

VIRGINIA WANG + Lori Himmel10558% games+8.1% vs expected
Amy McFarland + Brooke Wright5162% games+4.0% vs expected
Lacey McMurry + Jennifer DHaenens91743% games−1.1% vs expected
Candace Sturges + Amy McFarland5458% games−8.1% vs expected
Krystal Joscelyne + Lindsey Morrison2350% gamesnot enough data
Candace Sturges + Lori Himmel303 matchesnot enough data
Candace Sturges + Lacey McMurry033 matchesnot enough data
Lacey McMurry + Lindsey Morrison123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy McFarland
32W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Jennifer DHaenens
38W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Gina Merrill
47W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
VIRGINIA WANG
44W–45L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Krystal Joscelyne
69W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Lori Himmel
36W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Brooke Wright
33W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Lindsey Morrison
37W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Candace Sturges
34W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Lacey McMurry
43W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.