Teams

JMyers-CHCC

2026 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-29vs JWeiser-HRWon 40
W#1 DoublesMeghan Burns / Kimberly Jeffs vs Renu Mathias / Lindsey Kronmiller6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer Braby vs Athena Samaras6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCourtney Yarbrough / Erin Kent vs Susan Kim / Amanda Klein6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Horrigan / Marci Hansen vs Jan ORegan / Carolina Quiroga6-0, 6-1
2026-04-22vs JWeiser-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoanna Hooten / Leslie Fernandez vs Renu Mathias / Amanda Klein6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Moody / Elizabeth Richards vs Susan Kim / Kathleen Fitts6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarrie Tilley / Jennifer Braby vs Jan ORegan / Rachel Hawkins6-1, 6-1
2026-04-15vs AHeymann-UNCLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Kent / Elizabeth Richards vs Leslie Heymann / Rebekah Farris2-3
L#2 DoublesMarci Hansen / Karrie Tilley vs Anne Heymann / Lauren Zedek4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Yarbrough / Courtney Whilden vs Lauren Butare Smith / Rebecca Tomasini7-5, 7-6
2026-04-08vs KCabelka-HRLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeghan Burns / Kimberly Jeffs vs Anna Wilson / Lindsey McIver6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaura Horrigan / Jennifer Yost vs Karen Sonders / Amanda Alexander Klein6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarci Hansen / Courtney Yarbrough vs Lisa Andrew / Doreen Sanfelici1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-31vs EEverett-HVCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Jeffs / Julie Myers vs Laurie Myer / Mary Grigg6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-03-25vs LWollman-CHCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSara Moody / Meghan Burns vs Carrie Williamson / Mignon Lunsford1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Myers / Erin Kent vs Lee Wollman / Valerie Williams6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarrie Tilley / Jennifer Braby vs Julie Vozella / Laurie Oakley6-3, 6-3
2026-03-11vs AHeymann-UNCLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Richards / Sara Moody vs Rebekah Farris / Courtney Mills1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Myers / Karrie Tilley vs Anne Heymann / Lauren Zedek5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Jeffs / Courtney Yarbrough vs Leslie Heymann / Lisa Saenz3-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs KCabelka-HRLost 13
W#1 DoublesLeslie Fernandez / Joanna Hooten vs Kim Cabelka / Helen Youngblood6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCourtney Whilden vs Lindsey McIver5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesErin Kent / Sara Moody vs Barbie McGarrah / Anna Wilson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Richards / Laura Horrigan vs Doreen Sanfelici / Rose Corey6-7, 4-6
2026-02-25vs EEverett-HVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Kent / Sara Moody vs Mary Grigg / Susan Hayes6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Jeffs / Meghan Burns vs Stacey Smith / Susan Peak6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKarrie Tilley / Courtney Whilden vs Ashley Perry / Emily Huckabee6-2, 6-4
2026-02-18vs LWollman-CHCCWon 40
W#1 DoublesMeghan Burns / Joanna Hooten vs Sarah Lamb / Julie Vozella6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennifer Braby vs Carrie Williamson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Moody / Courtney Whilden vs Christy Bowman / Laurie Oakley7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Myers / Karrie Tilley vs Pippa Englert / Meredith Fitch6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Marci Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Joanna Hooten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Sara Moody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Meghan Burns
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.90
Kimberly Jeffs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Elizabeth Richards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Jennifer Braby
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Jennifer Yost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Erin Kent
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Laura Horrigan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Courtney Whilden
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Karrie Tilley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Courtney Yarbrough
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Whilden + Karrie Tilley4253% games−1.2% vs expected
Kimberly Jeffs + Marci Hansen4265% gamesnot enough data
Marci Hansen + Courtney Whilden3251% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Richards + Sara Moody314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Braby + Joanna Hooten314 matchesnot enough data
Marci Hansen + Karrie Tilley224 matchesnot enough data
Marci Hansen + Joanna Hooten134 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Yarbrough + Marci Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marci Hansen
51W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Joanna Hooten
77W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Sara Moody
31W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Meghan Burns
17W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Kimberly Jeffs
37W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Elizabeth Richards
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Jennifer Braby
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Jennifer Yost
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Erin Kent
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Laura Horrigan
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Courtney Whilden
49W–69L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Karrie Tilley
40W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Courtney Yarbrough
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.