Teams

KY/BG/ALDERSON

2026 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over- BG · 3.0 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs KY/BG/JOINERWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Murray / Khyati Chaudhari vs Tabitha Joiner / Kay Faesel3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Belt / Paula Edwards vs Christy Bruce / Lauren Brown7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanice Allen / Donna Alderson vs Julie Grothe / Jeanne McGriff6-2, 6-2
2026-05-16vs KY/BG/JOINERWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Wise / Cheryl Hensel vs Sarah Renick / Julie Grothe6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Alderson / Khyati Chaudhari vs Kristeen Owens / Karina Rosales6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Murray / Janice Allen vs Lauren Brown / Mary Stubblefield6-1, 6-2
2026-05-10vs KY/BG/JOINERWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Murray / Khyati Chaudhari vs Kay Faesel / Tabitha Joiner6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJanice Belt / Paula Edwards vs Christy Bruce / Lauren Brown6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKate Buser vs Kayla Kirby6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanice Allen / Donna Alderson vs Julie Grothe / Jeanne McGriff6-1, 6-0
2026-05-09vs KY/BG/JOINERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Hensel / Heather Wise vs Julie Grothe / Sarah Renick6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Alderson / Khyati Chaudhari vs Karina Rosales / Kristeen Owens3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKate Buser vs Caitlyn Traughber2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Allen / Jennifer Murray vs Lauren Brown / Mary Stubblefield7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/BG/ALDERSON22101020174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Paula Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Cheryl Hensel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Janice Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Janice Belt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Donna Alderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Khyati Chaudhari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Kate Buser
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Belt + Paula Edwards6168% games+10.2% vs expected
Donna Alderson + Janice Allen4172% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Edwards
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Cheryl Hensel
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Janice Allen
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Janice Belt
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Donna Alderson
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Khyati Chaudhari
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Kate Buser
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.