Teams

HRCA PINK

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.28 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs HG TEALWon 40
W#1 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Alesha Watson vs Charity Aslin / Marla Terwilliger6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Shelley Reed6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacey Feltman / Rachel Feiman vs Jennifer Gruidel / Joan Eckrich6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Katsnelson / Soyon Bueno vs Elise Luter / Suzette Loving6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-13vs SSD BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesRachel Feiman / Alesha Watson vs Heather Larson / Pamela Coe4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarrie Erickson vs Rebecca Handley6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStacey Feltman / Jennifer Swiecki vs Jane Tupler / Nadia Tippett6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Tamiko Norris vs Nancy Post / Anne-Marie Hukriede6-2, 7-5
2021-07-06vs SSH YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Swiecki / Alesha Watson vs Kathy Aarnio / Cheryl Jones3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Crystal Clark2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Erickson / Heather Coker vs Amy Wesselink / Kathi Engelken6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Robin DiCicco vs Susan Canetto / Jennifer Lobb7-6, 7-6
2021-06-29vs LEBTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarrie Erickson / Heather Coker vs Julie Greco / Mary LePino Butler6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Feiman vs Amy Hansel6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacey Feltman / Jennifer Swiecki vs Megan Fry / Juli Gage-Macdonald6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Tamiko Norris vs Lynn Merkel / Kiersten Knapp6-2, 6-1
2021-06-22vs KC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Rachel Feiman vs Ashley Campsie / Kristen Hoffman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Sara Pridgen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Cabot / Jennifer Swiecki vs Corinne Kesner / Carolyn Wachuta0-6, 4-6
2021-06-15vs KC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesCarrie Erickson / Heather Coker vs Christie Weber / Alyssa Elmore4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlesha Watson vs Julia McCoy4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSoyon Bueno / Lisa Cabot vs Heather Miner / Julie Hobart3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Feiman / Kelly Katsnelson vs Sarah Carlson / Telly Weddon3-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs HW GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesCarrie Erickson / Heather Coker vs Julie King / Bonnie Olson6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachel Feiman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlesha Watson / Stacey Feltman vs Jamie Vonfeldt / Jennifer Kuptz6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Soyon Bueno vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Carrie Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Rachel Feiman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Alesha Watson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Heather Coker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Cabot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Robin DiCicco
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Stacey Feltman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Soyon Bueno
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.49
Kelly Katsnelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Swiecki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tamiko Norris
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alesha Watson + Rachel Feiman251258% games+4.6% vs expected
Alesha Watson + Heather Coker8263% games+4.0% vs expected
Soyon Bueno + Robin DiCicco12358% games+3.8% vs expected
Soyon Bueno + Lisa Cabot6353% games+3.2% vs expected
Heather Coker + Carrie Erickson351459% games+2.4% vs expected
Rachel Feiman + Heather Coker8451% games+0.9% vs expected
Tamiko Norris + Robin DiCicco3356% games−0.6% vs expected
Stacey Feltman + Jennifer Swiecki141449% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Erickson
76W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Rachel Feiman
80W–68L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alesha Watson
113W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Heather Coker
83W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Lisa Cabot
60W–54L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Robin DiCicco
92W–73L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Stacey Feltman
102W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Soyon Bueno
139W–134L career · 5 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Kelly Katsnelson
43W–33L career · 2 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jennifer Swiecki
38W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tamiko Norris
39W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.