← Teams

N OR-CAC-Birkhofer

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Liz DelPlato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Penny Birkhofer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Barbara Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Crystal Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Lisa Clevenger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2025-06-21Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesCarol Devencenzi / Barbara Adams vs Kimberly Sahlin / Pam MacDuff6-3, 6-3
2025-06-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Adams / Crystal Bryant vs Susan Massey / Sherry Rogers7-6, 7-5
2024-11-24Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Adams / Lisa Clevenger vs Lorna Goth / Lynne Nieda3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Liz DelPlato vs Tina Clancy / Rochelle Pluymers6-3, 6-1
2024-11-22Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Liz DelPlato vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Cathryn Hansen vs MELISSA PISHION BOTTA / Erika Wilson6-2, 6-0
2024-11-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Carla Wheeler / Julie Hansen6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCathryn Hansen / Katherine Kralj vs Karen Dellinger / Rie Sasakawa6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Tami Oglesby vs Angie Lee / Sharon Kim-Geib6-3, 6-3
2024-11-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Susie Jansky / Jean Herbst6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathryn Hansen / Katherine Kralj vs Laura Luthi / Linda Lovett6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Tami Oglesby vs Catherine Go / Kim Stevens6-3, 7-5
2024-10-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Liz DelPlato vs Joan Major / Kathleen Budnick6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbara Adams / Michele Snyder vs Starlyn Corley / Michele Heinrichson6-2, 6-4
2024-10-06Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Liz DelPlato vs Karen McNairy / Susan Suttich6-2, 3-0
W#3 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Tami Oglesby vs Saki Newman / Lora Wahl7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Elda Nelson vs Kathleen Goodfriend / Char Riley6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Michele Snyder vs Jana Corder / Amy Alpern4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMisty Bettis / Lisa Clevenger vs Blythe Knott / Trish Vawter6-3, 6-2
2024-09-08Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Katherine Kralj vs Jan Rothert / Cathy Porter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Elda Nelson vs Char Riley / Becky Chasse6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Liz DelPlato
124W–99L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Penny Birkhofer
68W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Barbara Adams
13W–16L career
15%83%2%
3.68
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Crystal Bryant
105W–117L career
24%76%0%
3.53
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%1%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.