Teams

ACAC Waters

2022 Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over · Charlottesville

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Rowe / Joyce Steed vs Eric Parker / Kristina Parker6-4, 6-3
2022-07-17vs BHSC NolascoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Bazydlo / Diego Alejandro Parada vs Lynne Reigel / Luke Fairborn6-0, 6-2
2022-07-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Bazydlo / Diego Alejandro Parada vs Kristina Parker / Eric Parker6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-19vs BHSC NolascoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsay Bazydlo / Diego Alejandro Parada vs Jennie Chiu / Howell Fendley6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoyce Steed / Peter Gunter vs Luke Fairborn / Beverley Garbaccio6-1, 6-4
2022-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Jett / Diego Alejandro Parada vs Howell Fendley / Jennie Chiu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Rowe / Joyce Steed vs Eric Parker / Kristina Parker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-24Split 11
W#1 DoublesDiego Alejandro Parada / Lindsay Bazydlo vs Daniel Carlson / Tammy Schwab6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonald Polifka / Joyce Steed vs Amy Nolasco / Mark Raffinan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Donald Polifka
published 5
4.73
Diego Alejandro Parada
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.46
Brian Rowe
published 4.5
4.21
Joyce Steed
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Erin Waters
published 4.5
4.07
Ellen Markowitz
published 4.5
4.00
Lindsay Bazydlo
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.81
CAROLYN WARD
published 4
3.77
Lisa Jett
published
Amit Shahane
published 4
Chike Dellimore
published 4
3.62
Peter Gunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Bazydlo + Diego Alejandro Parada80966% games+14.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Donald Polifka
2W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Diego Alejandro Parada
134W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.73
4.5
Brian Rowe
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Joyce Steed
109W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Erin Waters
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Ellen Markowitz
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.07
4
Lindsay Bazydlo
406W–144L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
CAROLYN WARD
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Lisa Jett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Amit Shahane
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chike Dellimore
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Gunter
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.