Teams

OC Marguerite Tennis- Laura 1030

2023 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Sara Wiens
published
3.69
3.65
JENNIFER BRASCH
published 4
3.64
Ellen Aistars
published 4
3.57
Caroline Gee
published 4
3.33
Dana Orsini
published 3.5
3.25
Leah Dietz
published
3.23
Gillian Levy
published 3.5
3.23
Leslie Boehm
published
3.22
Patty Rydelski
published
3.10
Kelley McBride
published
Laura Schlom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Aistars + Caroline Gee6753% games+2.1% vs expected
Patty Rydelski + Leah Dietz7256% games+1.9% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + JENNIFER BRASCH3256% games+1.4% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + Kelley McBride123 matchesnot enough data
JENNIFER BRASCH + Julia Bruno McAndrew213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Wiens
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Julia Bruno McAndrew
61W–21L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
JENNIFER BRASCH
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Ellen Aistars
31W–25L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Caroline Gee
26W–18L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Leah Dietz
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gillian Levy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Leslie Boehm
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Kelley McBride
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Laura Schlom
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.