Teams

Wright/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-19vs Fountain/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Dorsett / Alecia Monett vs Julie Lewis / Sookyo Kim1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEstelle Mitchell vs Keneisha Fountain6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesParker Pippen / Amber Sand vs Susan Reyna / Deanne Helvering2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-12vs Cousar/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCristina Guibao / Alecia Monett vs KIMBERLY JUSSELY / Morgan Thornton1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmma Dotson vs Shelby Monteverde5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelcie Nollner / Julie Upchurch vs Jenni Harris / Helene Harris6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-28vs Baty/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlicia Wright / Julie Upchurch vs Allie Baty / Brittany Spence4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCristina Guibao vs Locke Waldrop1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesParker Pippen / Amber Sand vs Kristin Frazier / Sloane Hankins2-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Kinney/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Upchurch / Katherine Dorsett vs Barbara Halliburton / Ashley Elder0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEstelle Mitchell vs Angela Finerson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Sand / Parker Pippen vs Terry Bondurant / Barbara Wilson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Kelcie Nollner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Alecia Monett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Julie Upchurch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Estelle Mitchell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.23
Emma Dotson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.22
Cristina Guibao
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Parker Pippen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Amber Sand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Alicia Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.94
Katherine Dorsett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelcie Nollner + Julie Upchurch10356% games+8.8% vs expected
Amber Sand + Parker Pippen1632% games−8.2% vs expected
Cristina Guibao + Estelle Mitchell314 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Wright + Katherine Dorsett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelcie Nollner
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
2.5
Alecia Monett
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Julie Upchurch
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Estelle Mitchell
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Emma Dotson
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Cristina Guibao
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Parker Pippen
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Amber Sand
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Alicia Wright
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Katherine Dorsett
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.