Teams

Falling for Foxcroft

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.0 Women FF

13 players · average NTRP 2.86 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-08vs Busby-Frank/GCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesCatherine Boetsch / Kathryn Means vs Molly Netzler / Melissa Richardson6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRiley Smith vs Jamie Bach4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBobbi Bateman / Anne Taaffe vs Suzanne Massey Schemm / Rachel Vick6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJaime Stevens / Karen Tomforde vs Jessica Siler / Lauren Barber2-6, 3-6
2024-11-01vs UPTA18FF/Samuel-Posta/SouthsideWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Borck / Riley Smith vs Gloria Bleasdale / Eunice Samuel6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathryn Means vs Kelly Johnson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBobbi Bateman / Susan Tomforde vs Ashley Hill / Natallia Sianko6-4, 6-3
2024-10-24vs Sets and the City/NorthsideWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Boetsch / Riley Smith vs JB Robinson / Sandy Shaw6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJaime Stevens / Brittany McKenzie vs Blair Zeimetz / Bronwen Greene6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Tomforde / Karen Tomforde vs Sandy Buol / Ashley Rehn3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-18vs UPTA18A/Benfield/Sugar CreekSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRiley Smith / Janielle Redmond vs Jodi Fortenberry / Erin McArthur5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Taaffe vs Maria Batista7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJaime Stevens / Laura Borck vs Julie Stephens / Mary Nunes7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Tomforde / Erin Chilton vs Cristina Torres / Kerri Hughes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-11vs UPTA18FF/Henderson/RiverWalkLost 13
W#1 DoublesAshley Brown / Janielle Redmond vs Melanie Pickhardt / Claudia Kornaros6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCatherine Boetsch vs Van Nguyen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany McKenzie / Bobbi Bateman vs Lora Henderson / Ann Brodie5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Tomforde / Laura Borck vs Kimberly Alber / Erica Ritter4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Kathryn Means
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.43
Catherine Boetsch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Anne Taaffe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
Riley Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.95
Brittany McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Laura Borck
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Susan Tomforde
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Janielle Redmond
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.56
Jaime Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Bobbi Bateman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.46
Jamie Dawson
published 2.5
2.26
Karen Tomforde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Chilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Means + Catherine Boetsch17563% games+10.5% vs expected
Riley Smith + Catherine Boetsch4162% gamesnot enough data
Bobbi Bateman + Jaime Stevens044 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Bateman + Jamie Dawson134 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Bateman + Susan Tomforde314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Borck + Bobbi Bateman213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Borck + Jaime Stevens123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Borck + Susan Tomforde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Means
44W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Catherine Boetsch
32W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3
Anne Taaffe
22W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
Riley Smith
28W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Brittany McKenzie
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Laura Borck
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Susan Tomforde
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Janielle Redmond
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.60
3
Jaime Stevens
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Bobbi Bateman
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Jamie Dawson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%63%37%
2.46
Karen Tomforde
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Erin Chilton
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.