Teams

MSilla/SPapa (BCC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-07vs SJerrell/JKilduff (Sardis)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSiobhan Papa / Michelle Silla vs Elizabeth Tabor / Andrea Johnson7-6, 6-3
2024-09-23vs TEby (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Webster / Michelle Silla vs Christine Shultz / Angie Mehrizi4-6, 2-6
2024-09-16vs JSwanson (Springfield)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNathalie Malter / Michelle Silla vs Melissa Warren / Karen Garland6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-09vs KSmith (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristin Webster / Michelle Silla vs Wanda Mallette / Tesha Davis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-26vs BHerman (PCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Silla / Kristin Webster vs Laurie Eatman / Melissa Pavlovich6-2, 6-3
2024-08-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Silla / Lisa Short vs Kelsey Gerber / Kelly Johnson6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Siobhan Papa
published
2.86
Tracy Reitz
published
2.73
Kristin Webster
published
2.48
Ellen McKane
published
2.47
Nathalie Malter
published
2.46
Michelle Silla
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Linda Shelton
published
2.32
Lisa Short
published
Kate Reddy
published
Kim Rosenburgh
published
Kristina Nichols
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Reitz + Kristin Webster0538% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Siobhan Papa
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
Tracy Reitz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
Kristin Webster
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Ellen McKane
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Nathalie Malter
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Michelle Silla
39W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.46
Linda Shelton
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.34
Lisa Short
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.32
Kate Reddy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Rosenburgh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristina Nichols
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.