Teams

LVTA

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-29vs CSUWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Karen Pielin vs Susan Davidson / Kim Jensen6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Sue Schneider vs Brenda Stewart / Karen Trevino4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTracy King / Gina Solanyk vs Kathleen Vandenberg / Marcia Linley6-3, 6-1
2022-06-22vs WYOWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen vs Ginger Paige / Patricia Hansen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSue Schneider / Dawn Hagen vs Debra Olson / Jeannette McGowan6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesGina Solanyk / Linda Seals vs Katherine Plowman / Jayne Smith3-6, 2-6
2022-06-15vs TAGWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Dawn Hagen vs Lori Loeb / Laura Dunn2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Tracy King vs Janet Crespin / Larea Warden2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Pielin / Gina Solanyk vs Falguni Gill / Becky Buhler6-4, 7-5
2022-06-13vs HMTC CRIMSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Karen Pielin vs Teresa Adsit / Nancy Williams6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDawn Hagen / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Jill Braddock / Ingrid Parsons6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTracy King / Gina Solanyk vs Christine Richardson / Michele MacHado7-5, 6-4
2022-06-08vs HMTC PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Dawn Hagen vs Marne Engelking / Ann Smerud6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Pielin / Sue Schneider vs Kathi Freemann / Cathy Simon6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGina Solanyk / Linda Seals vs Patti Ingels / Judy O'Gorman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-25vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Dawn Hagen vs Camille Benton / June Ellen Feil3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen vs Jennifer Camp / Jane Gronewoller3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Pielin / Linda Seals vs Kelly Day / Lisa Olsen3-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs MLFWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Dawn Hagen vs Mary Wedum / Jean Tonoli6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen vs Carol Hiller / Linda Mohr6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSue Schneider / Linda Seals vs Pat Athey / Betty Gonzales5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-11vs CSULost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Dawn Hagen vs Marcia Linley / Susan Davidson6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Tracy King vs Barbara Balok / Adrienne LeBailly6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSue Schneider / Gina Solanyk vs Sara Mullarkey / Leticia Dunn0-6, 0-6
2022-05-07vs WYOWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Dawn Hagen vs Adelle Byra / Ginger Paige7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Pielin / Tracy King vs Cindy Schultz / Debra Olson6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJill Brooks / Linda Seals vs Katherine Plowman / Priscilla Gill6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jill Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.34
Debbie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dawn Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.67
Sue Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Gina Solanyk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Linda Seals
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hansen + Nancy Pflughoeft7457% games+4.5% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Gina Solanyk5448% games+3.2% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Sue Schneider3446% gamesnot enough data
Jill Brooks + Dawn Hagen5255% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Hagen + Nancy Pflughoeft224 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Hansen + Dawn Hagen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Brooks
79W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.83
3.5
Debbie Hansen
51W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Sue Schneider
11W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Gina Solanyk
13W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Linda Seals
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.