Teams

IPataki40+

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-11vs JDiamondLost 12
L#1 DoublesVagner Finelli / Damien Graham vs John Diamond / Scott Riley4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGeoff Knight vs Brent Townsend3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesIstvan Pataki / Ken Glanville vs Tony Stewart / Alvin Antony2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGeoff Knight vs Jason Smith5-7, 5-7
2022-04-27vs WValdespino/ChappellWon 10
W#1 SinglesSam Osman vs Thomas Bell6-4, 6-0
2022-04-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesGeoff Knight vs Mike Fiorello5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-06vs BBrooksLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeoff Knight / Damien Graham vs James King / Chip Payne4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSam Osman vs Chris Mann4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-30vs SWingo 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesGeoff Knight / Vagner Finelli vs Jeffrey Marcus / Vann Taylor6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDamien Graham / Luis Arcos vs Pete Padilla / Alan McSwain5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKen Glanville / Istvan Pataki vs Dylan DeMacy / Anthony Womack6-4, 6-4
2022-03-28vs JDiamondLost 01
L#3 DoublesIstvan Pataki / Luis Arcos vs John Diamond / Ken Nowell2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Sam Osman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Istvan Pataki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Roger Hatlen
published
3.78
Eric Solomon
published 4
3.75
Geoff Knight
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Kevin Sibillia
published
3.70
Damien Graham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Vagner Finelli
published
3.44
Ken Glanville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Istvan Pataki + Geoff Knight4156% gamesnot enough data
Istvan Pataki + Sam Osman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sam Osman
93W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Istvan Pataki
111W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Eric Solomon
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Geoff Knight
43W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Kevin Sibillia
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Damien Graham
28W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Vagner Finelli
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.60
Ken Glanville
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.