Teams

Selby

2025 Anne Arundel Combo · Anne Arundel Combo 5.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.61 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-14vs KennedyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Mullennix / Julie Grignon vs Linda Harrell / Heather Hollenbach7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaurie Selby / Lara Henneman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-12-07vs KennedyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Pailthorp / Laura Mitsopoulos vs Francesca Dougherty / Heather Hollenbach6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGrace Doerfler / Kelly Ryan vs Regan Checcio / Li Fu6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Victoria Ehly vs Tiffany Clark / Amanda Drewry5-7, 1-6
2025-11-30vs KennedyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Grignon / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Regan Lonchena / Ragnhild Erdely6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Ryan / Lara Henneman vs Kimberly Gowen / Heather Hollenbach1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVictoria Ehly / Laurie Selby vs Linda Harrell / Li Fu6-4, 6-1
2025-11-22vs KennedyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Doerfler / Ann Pailthorp vs Francesca Dougherty / Ragnhild Erdely0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Mullennix / Lori Connors-Tadros vs Tiffany Clark / Heather Hollenbach4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Vinopal / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Regan Checcio / Li Fu6-7, 3-4
2025-11-02vs KennedyWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Mitsopoulos / Lynn Hoffman vs Regan Lonchena / Betsy Morris6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Victoria Ehly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLara Henneman / Lori Connors-Tadros vs Amanda Drewry / Li Fu7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-25vs KennedyLost 02
L#1 DoublesGrace Doerfler / Liz Macdonald vs Francesca Dougherty / Ragnhild Erdely1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLori Connors-Tadros / Mary Mullennix vs Amanda Drewry / Tiffany Clark4-6, 2-6
2025-10-19vs KennedyLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Selby / Julie Grignon vs Regan Lonchena / Ragnhild Erdely1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Mullennix / Laura Mitsopoulos vs Amanda Drewry / Li Fu4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandra Julian / Ann Pailthorp vs Linda Harrell / Tiffany Clark3-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs KennedyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Lynn Hoffman vs Francesca Dougherty / Tiffany Clark4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Julian / Victoria Ehly vs Linda Harrell / Li Fu2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLara Henneman / Grace Doerfler vs Regan Checcio / Betsy Morris6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Lynn Hoffman
published
2.85
Victoria Ehly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Julie Grignon
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.70
Liz Macdonald
published
2.64
Ann Pailthorp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.53
Kelly Ryan
published
2.52
Laurie Selby
published
2.48
Laura Mitsopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.41
Kay Kalber
published
2.40
Mary Mullennix
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.38
Sandra Julian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.32
Kelly Vinopal
published
2.31
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.31
Grace Doerfler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Lara Henneman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.23
Lori Connors-Tadros
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Mullennix + Ann Pailthorp6069% games+11.5% vs expected
Victoria Ehly + Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne213 matchesnot enough data
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne + Lara Henneman123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Mullennix + Laurie Selby033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Hoffman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Victoria Ehly
31W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Julie Grignon
85W–70L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Liz Macdonald
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Ann Pailthorp
50W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.64
Kelly Ryan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Laurie Selby
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Laura Mitsopoulos
29W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Kay Kalber
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Mary Mullennix
39W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Sandra Julian
34W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Kelly Vinopal
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
38W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Grace Doerfler
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Lara Henneman
21W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Lori Connors-Tadros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.