Teams

LCTA65/Shor/Snee Farm

65 & Over Combo Doubles · 65 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-08vs LCTA65/Meador/AshboroughLost 03
L#1 DoublesDara Craven / Krista Sandy vs Melanie Ivonowski / Lynn Meador0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Fink / Karen Lewis vs Sherry Lilley / Jenny Gabrielli2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGloria Prindle / Janet Christ vs Judy Hartzog / Denise Standish3-6, 4-6
2025-08-25vs LCTA/Dever/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Shor / Patricia Hnat vs Patricia Dever / Mary Cecil0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinder Laffitte / Nancy McEachern vs Annie Thigpen / Wendy Evans4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Rose / Gloria Prindle vs Leila Holmes / Terry Linker1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-20vs LCTA65/Mock/CTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy McEachern / Thea Trett vs Frances Bath / Mary Davis2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDara Craven / Linder Laffitte vs Renie Forsberg / Cynthia Thomas6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSandie Frank / Janet Christ vs Susan Elliott / Susan Mock6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-18vs LCTA65/Cranor/LTPDILost 12
L#1 DoublesLinder Laffitte / Gloria Prindle vs Christiane Jones / Danher Wang3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSandie Frank / Janet Christ vs Faye Bull / Angela Williams6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKrista Sandy / Dara Craven vs Mindy Rosenthal / Mary Ann Ramsey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-04vs LCTA65/Meador/AshboroughLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy McEachern / Sharon Skowronek vs Jenny Gabrielli / Sherry Lilley0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Prindle / Krista Sandy vs Judy Hartzog / Lynn Meador3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinder Laffitte / Karen Lewis vs Liz Giancola / Denise Standish7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-28vs LCTA65/Mock/CTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDara Craven / Linder Laffitte vs Rebecca Woods / Cynthia Thomas6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy McEachern / Janet Rose vs Frances Bath / Andrea Weinstein7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlison Shor / Patricia Hnat vs Mary Young / Susan Mock4-6, 4-6
2025-07-21vs LCTA/Dever/MPRLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinder Laffitte / Thea Trett vs Mary Cecil / Martha Stoney3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy McEachern / Krista Sandy vs Elaine Herbst / Anne Schmidt6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlison Shor / Janet Christ vs Marie Cunningham / Annie Thigpen6-2, 6-4
2025-07-14vs LCTA65/Cranor/LTPDILost 12
W#1 DoublesLinder Laffitte / Alison Shor vs Trelle Stephens / Danher Wang7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Lewis / Krista Sandy vs Sharon Oldfield / Kathleen Ricciardi1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDara Craven / Janet Rose vs Gigi McNinch / Jan Stein5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Alison Shor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Dara Craven
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Sandie Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Nancy McEachern
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Gloria Prindle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Ann Fink
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Janet Rose
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Janet Christ
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Patricia Hnat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Lewis
published
Krista Sandy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Linder Laffitte
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sharon Skowronek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thea Trett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Lewis + Linder Laffitte1643% games−7.7% vs expected
Janet Christ + Patricia Hnat3549% gamesnot enough data
Ann Fink + Sandie Frank2341% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Skowronek + Janet Christ303 matchesnot enough data
Dara Craven + Sandie Frank123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Shor
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Dara Craven
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sandie Frank
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Nancy McEachern
24W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Gloria Prindle
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Ann Fink
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Janet Rose
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Janet Christ
26W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
Patricia Hnat
12W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Karen Lewis
32W–63L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Krista Sandy
11W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linder Laffitte
107W–87L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Skowronek
21W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thea Trett
1W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.