Teams

5*MLong-Eno

2024 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men Wknd

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-29vs 4*JMontague-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Ratliff / Francisco Burbano vs Eric Lindblom / Jeff Reedy2-6, 1-6
2024-07-27vs 1*PBream-UNCLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoonho Oh / Ra Yasin vs Seth Noar / Scott Whitt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-13vs 8*PHariharan-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Richard Millard vs Deepak Jayashankaran / Rahul Narang1-6, 1-6
2024-06-29vs 7*NPuri-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Richard Millard vs Krishna Alijala / Raymond Xu1-6, 1-6
2024-06-22vs 3*JByrd-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesAustin Council / Austin Gardner vs Ansen Gunawan / Christopher DeFusco6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-15vs 2*CMoffitt-EnoLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Ratliff / Francisco Burbano vs Dash Rajarajhan / Madison Alexander6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAustin Gardner / Rob McGarrah vs Jay Krueger / Michael Young0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlex Kappus / Austin Council vs Joseph Davis / Chris Moffitt6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-01vs 6*AYoung-EVWon 10
W#3 DoublesConor Lynch / Rob McGarrah vs Reggie Oakley / Ryan Boyles6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michael Ratliff
published
3.26
Austin Gardner
published 3.5
3.16
Richard Millard
published
3.15
Francisco Burbano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Austin Council
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Conor Lynch
published 3
2.99
Rob McGarrah
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Ra Yasin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
Joonho Oh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francisco Burbano + Michael Ratliff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Austin Gardner
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Richard Millard
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–81L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Austin Council
45W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Conor Lynch
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Rob McGarrah
70W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Ra Yasin
51W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Joonho Oh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.