Teams

Parrish/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Men - Saturday Daytime

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs McKeown/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Menzie / Charlie Sevier vs Randy Kerr / Brian Schaaf6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMesa Carlson / David Carrillo vs Arthur Garcia / Mark Sargent6-0, 6-4
W#4 DoublesJ Christopher Atkinson / John Faldetta vs Jeff Khan / Brandon Dixon6-1, 6-4
2026-04-25vs McKeown/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesDavid Carrillo / Edmund Sauer vs David Johnston / Robert Grimes2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJacob Parrish vs Mark Sargent6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSeth Benton / Mesa Carlson vs Randy Kerr / Sean Hughes6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJ Christopher Atkinson / Daniel Oxford vs Ray Blair / Ryan Reeve6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesBrian Finkelmeyer / Craig Menzie vs Robert DeLucas / David Murrayd6-3, 7-6
2026-04-18vs McKeown/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesSeth Benton / Colten Jones vs Robert Grimes / Igor Shalkevich6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Oxford vs Mark Sargent6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Carrillo / Doug Story vs Ray Blair / Arthur Garcia6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJ Christopher Atkinson / Chris Mitchell vs Jeff Khan / Michael McKeown6-3, 6-4
2026-04-11vs McKeown/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesSeth Benton / Brian Finkelmeyer vs Randy Kerr / Robert Grimes7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesChris Mitchell vs Michael McKeown6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacob Parrish / Doug Story vs John Piovarcy / Brandon Dixon6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRyan Hitt / Daniel Oxford vs David Johnston / Arthur Garcia6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesEdmund Sauer / David Carrillo vs Jeff Khan / Ryan Reeve6-4, 6-0
2026-04-04vs McKeown/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesCharlie Sevier / Doug Story vs Robert DeLucas / Igor Shalkevich6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJacob Parrish vs Mark Sargent6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Finkelmeyer / Craig Menzie vs Ray Blair / Jeff Khan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Mitchell / Alvaro Victoria vs Brandon Dixon / Michael McKeown6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesJohn Faldetta / Brannon Jones vs David Murrayd / Arthur Garcia6-2, 7-6
2026-03-28vs McKeown/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesEdmund Sauer / Daniel Oxford vs Igor Shalkevich / Robert Grimes6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDoug Story vs Michael McKeown6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMesa Carlson / David Carrillo vs David Johnston / David Murrayd6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrannon Jones / Colten Jones vs Robert Cain / Mark Sargent6-3, 6-1
W#4 DoublesRyan Hitt / John Faldetta vs Ryan Reeve / Ray Blair6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Jacob Parrish
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.38
Chris Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Charlie Sevier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.35
Daniel Oxford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Seth Benton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Craig Menzie
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Mesa Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Ryan Hitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
4.28
Doug Story
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.27
Brian Finkelmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
David Carrillo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Alvaro Victoria
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brannon Jones
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
John Faldetta
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
J Christopher Atkinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Menzie + Brian Finkelmeyer404 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Oxford + Ryan Hitt213 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Hitt + John Faldetta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Parrish
25W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
Chris Mitchell
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Charlie Sevier
17W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Daniel Oxford
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Seth Benton
10W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Craig Menzie
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Mesa Carlson
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Ryan Hitt
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Doug Story
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Brian Finkelmeyer
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
David Carrillo
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Alvaro Victoria
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Brannon Jones
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Faldetta
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
J Christopher Atkinson
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.