Teams

ATC/Hale-Goodie 55

2025 COTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-14vs COTA/Jennie DemingWon 21
L#1 DoublesSallie Hale / Margie Hull vs Lisa Lyons / Donna Webb6-4, 1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWanda Beard / Donna Matthews vs Jennie Deming / Deborah Abernathy6-1, 3-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShelley Hulland / Cathy Gruetter vs Sandra Lucius / Denise Shirey4-6, 6-4, 7-6
2025-03-29vs COTA/Jennie DemingLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Johnston / Chinami Goodie vs Bursley Hoefer / Jennie Deming3-6, 6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Gruetter / Pam Smith vs Wieka McBride / Sandra Lucius4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSallie Hale / Patricia Burke vs Deborah Abernathy / Denise Shirey4-6, 3-6
2025-02-24vs COTA/Jennie DemingLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Matthews / Susan McKinney vs Bursley Hoefer / Marianne Jones0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Gruetter / Sallie Hale vs Kathee Gabriel / Jennifer Garrison2-6, 6-1, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargie Hull / Jennifer Johnston vs Sandra Lucius / Denise Shirey7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Susan McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Margie Hull
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Shelley Hulland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Chinami Goodie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Cathy Gruetter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Wanda Beard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Debbie Culpepper
published 3
2.96
Lorie Gochenour
published
2.93
Donna Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Lisa Oelke
published
2.73
Sallie Hale
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Crew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sallie Hale + Wanda Beard3249% games+10.6% vs expected
Debbie Culpepper + Wanda Beard5750% games+2.4% vs expected
Cathy Gruetter + Sallie Hale4844% games+1.1% vs expected
Susan McKinney + Donna Matthews1441% games−9.7% vs expected
Wanda Beard + Donna Matthews1441% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Gruetter + Shelley Hulland314 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Gruetter + Margie Hull123 matchesnot enough data
Margie Hull + Wanda Beard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan McKinney
30W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Margie Hull
23W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Shelley Hulland
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chinami Goodie
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Cathy Gruetter
18W–30L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Wanda Beard
24W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Debbie Culpepper
11W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lorie Gochenour
4W–19L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Donna Matthews
27W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
Lisa Oelke
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Sallie Hale
20W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Nancy Crew
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.