Teams

ROCC/Bradford-Richter W3.5

2022 DTA 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

25 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Julianne Evans
published
3.55
Kelley Green
published
3.48
Kelly Turco
published
3.46
Fran Matise
published 3.5
3.46
Janice van Arsdale
published
3.43
Rachel Cutshaw
published
3.40
Andrea Bradford
published 3.5
3.30
Liza Schlitt
published
3.29
Erin Copley
published 3.5
Deanna Carrell
published 3.5
3.25
Courtney Gilbert
published 3.5
3.21
Melissa Peticolas
published
3.15
Laurie Korinek
published
3.14
Lindsay Mayer
published
3.13
Mary Beth Duffy
published
3.13
Mary Yang
published
3.10
Lily Treacy
published
2.99
Emily Cox
published 3.5
Carol Kallman
published
Leslie Wayne
published
Lisa Wallace
published
Mandy Evans
published
Marisa Schroeder
published
Melanie Feigenbaum
published
Molly Cordell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Matise + Janice van Arsdale404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julianne Evans
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelley Green
20W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Kelly Turco
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Fran Matise
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Janice van Arsdale
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Rachel Cutshaw
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Andrea Bradford
18W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Liza Schlitt
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Erin Copley
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Deanna Carrell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Courtney Gilbert
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Melissa Peticolas
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Laurie Korinek
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lindsay Mayer
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Mary Beth Duffy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Mary Yang
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Lily Treacy
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Emily Cox
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Carol Kallman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Wayne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Wallace
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mandy Evans
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marisa Schroeder
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie Feigenbaum
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Cordell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.