Teams

Hackney (Salvador Park)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.42
Brian Ahmes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Mauricio Gomm Santos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
Njavwa Mulwanda
published
4.29
Ken Cheng
published
4.27
Andrew Hellinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Felipe Torres
published 4.5
4.20
Mitchell Stoller
published
4.19
Raymond Hackney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.16
Michael Berkowitz
published
4.11
Denis Pierrot
published 4.5
4.11
Jorge Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
Robert Gorham
published
Rodrigo Arrangoiz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raymond Hackney + Njavwa Mulwanda5257% games+7.0% vs expected
Raymond Hackney + Mauricio Gomm Santos11461% gamesnot enough data
Raymond Hackney + Andrew Hellinger4848% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Hellinger + Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira3253% gamesnot enough data
Robert Gorham + Andrew Hellinger134 matchesnot enough data
Jorge Ramirez + Felipe Torres134 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Hackney + Jorge Ramirez123 matchesnot enough data
Robert Gorham + Denis Pierrot033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira
55W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
4.49
4.5
Brian Ahmes
52W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
Mauricio Gomm Santos
71W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.34
Njavwa Mulwanda
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Ken Cheng
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Andrew Hellinger
46W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Felipe Torres
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Mitchell Stoller
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Raymond Hackney
157W–112L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Michael Berkowitz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Denis Pierrot
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.11
Jorge Ramirez
90W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Robert Gorham
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Rodrigo Arrangoiz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.