← Teams

PTC-Melander/Ritchie

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.78 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Rachel Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Quinn Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Christina Melander
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Dan de Leon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Shiloh Halsey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
Nathan Klipp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Megan Finn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Kyle Pope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-12-08Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDan de Leon / Erin Casey vs Mikhail Golovnykh / Ruta Golovnykh6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMegan Finn / Nathan Klipp vs Josette Zervic / Marc Zimmerman6-1, 6-1
2024-11-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Tyler Pell vs Abby Hata / Sam Spieller6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesQuinn Hunt / Dan de Leon vs David Lee / Jennifer Witty7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristina Melander / Shiloh Halsey vs Vuong Nguyen / Lisa Kearns6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-26Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesShiloh Halsey / Christina Melander vs Brandie Hill / Aidan Lee6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Pope / Rachel Ritchie vs Brianna Hill / Chu Wu6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTyler Pell / Megan Finn vs Janet Risako Ohno / Nijimaru Ohno6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKate Oliver / Shiloh Halsey vs Morgan Cowling / Peter Singson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyle Pope / Quinn Hunt vs Kyle McGovern / KEELEY PLOMBON6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaie Wellman / Nathan Klipp vs Maya Mori / Alex McIntosh6-0, 7-5
2024-10-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesTyler Pell / Christina Melander vs Gregory Hobi / Andrea Hobi6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDan de Leon / Erin Casey vs Troy Johnston / Tami Socolofsky6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesQuinn Hunt / Kyle Pope vs Kim Christensen / Ian Preddy6-3, 6-1
2024-09-29Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesQuinn Hunt / Nathan Klipp vs Britani Kavanaugh / Sam Spieller4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Casey / Shiloh Halsey vs Lisa Kearns / Bill Eisen Amurao6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Pope / Christina Melander vs Jennifer Witty / David Lee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Dan de Leon vs Angie Urrutia / Harish Krishnamurthy6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErin Casey / Nathan Klipp vs NANDA SIDDAIAH / Jamie Heberlein6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Melander / Shiloh Halsey vs Tonya Halog / James Lawrence6-2, 6-3
2024-09-08Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Tyler Pell vs David Pham / Mihee Park6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Finn / Dan de Leon vs Yukiko Namba / Kevin Heller7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Ritchie
75W–19L career
0%67%33%
4.05
4
Quinn Hunt
37W–16L career
0%95%5%
3.90
4
Christina Melander
111W–81L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Dan de Leon
30W–28L career
22%78%0%
3.56
4
Shiloh Halsey
45W–33L career · type A
45%55%0%
3.46
3.5
Nathan Klipp
7W–10L career
2%89%9%
3.34
3.5
Megan Finn
32W–17L career
0%98%2%
3.34
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Kyle Pope
4W–8L career
13%86%1%
3.15

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.