Teams

Las Posas Shot Girls

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Jean Salcido
published
3.00
Jamie Hadler
published
2.89
Lisa ONeil
published
2.84
Beverly Torres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Zins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Felicula Tovar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Juliet Tamayo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.63
Candy Edwards
published 3
2.63
Dee Ann Emami
published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
published
2.60
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.60
Mary Nash
published
2.56
Ginger Kohler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Janet Talmadge
published
2.54
Catalina Wise
published 3
2.39
Riitta Andonian
published
2.34
Teresa James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Torres + Gina Howey11852% games+5.2% vs expected
Felicula Tovar + Mary Nash0539% games−13.4% vs expected
Riitta Andonian + Patty Bolland3444% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Tamayo + Felicula Tovar044 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Tamayo + Michelle Soto de Carvalho044 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Tamayo + Dee Ann Emami224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Pollock + Janet Talmadge123 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Kohler + Juliet Tamayo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jean Salcido
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Jamie Hadler
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lisa ONeil
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Lisa Zins
42W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Colleen Gulbranson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Felicula Tovar
32W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Juliet Tamayo
53W–102L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Candy Edwards
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Dee Ann Emami
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Ginger Kohler
24W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Catalina Wise
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Teresa James
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.