Teams

LLTC - Dad Bods

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Monday Men's Singles · 4.5 Men Singles

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-10vs HFTC - Thunder ThrashersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBrett Soderdahl vs Sasha Sudar1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMatthew McKillip vs Gregory Brumfield6-3, 6-1
2025-11-03vs HFTC - VenomLost 12
L#1 SinglesMark Etienne vs Pete Langstaff3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNathan Daniels vs Ray Eureste4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDong Song vs Kenneth Williams4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-27vs HFTC - SwangasWon 40
W#1 SinglesMark Etienne vs Jason Ye3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRichard Yang vs Carlos Anaya6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMatthew McKillip vs Chris Fuke6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#4 SinglesDong Song vs Stephen Brown6-3, 7-6
2025-10-20vs LLTC - HendrickLost 13
L#1 SinglesBrett Soderdahl vs Hendrick Suwirjo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Yang vs Antony Leung6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesDong Song vs Stern Yeh3-6, 3-6
L#4 SinglesNathan Daniels vs Ernest Wang6-7, 6-7
2025-10-06vs HFTC - Thunder ThrashersLost 03
L#1 SinglesRichard Yang vs Andrew Chen6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMark Etienne vs Thaddeus Holloway2-6, 3-6
L#4 SinglesDong Song vs Michael Salinas2-6, 3-6
2025-09-29vs HFTC - VenomLost 12
W#1 SinglesRichard Yang vs Ryan Denu6-0, 1-4
L#3 SinglesBrandon Sek vs Pete Langstaff2-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesMark Etienne vs Felix Eyzaguirre4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 Men Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HFTC - Swangas0591124176
2LLTC - Dad Bods06111329217
3LLTC - Hendrick06101430233
4HFTC - Venom07151331253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Brett Soderdahl
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Richard Yang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.11
Nathan Daniels
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.03
Grant Lopez
published
3.97
Matthew McKillip
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.73
Mark Etienne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.72
Dong Song
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.69
Brandon Sek
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Justin Chang
published
Peter Talosig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew McKillip + Grant Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brett Soderdahl
30W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Richard Yang
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Nathan Daniels
36W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Grant Lopez
69W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.03
Matthew McKillip
72W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
Mark Etienne
48W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
Dong Song
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Brandon Sek
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Justin Chang
19W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Talosig
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.