Teams

6-AJarvis-CHTC

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-26vs 4-NWatts-2.5-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesColleen Starns / Destiny Lopez vs Matalaba Napier / Janet Ranheim6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-19vs 3-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Erin Flanagan vs Allison Pack / Courtney Mangum2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLizzy Burch vs Belen Diaz Cisneros0-6, 0-6
2023-04-12vs 7-LBible-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesLizzy Burch / Erin Flanagan vs Loralie Bible / Lindsay Mize4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesColleen Starns vs Annie Burtoff6-7, 3-6
2023-03-29vs 2-KHolt-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdith Becerra / Ericka Briceno vs Terrie Blalock / Kathy Holt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-22vs 8-ACombs-CCC 18 & upWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Katie Elder6-1, 6-0
2023-03-15vs 1-KGreen-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEdith Becerra / Ericka Briceno vs Christy Kirk / Kelly Swisher6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLizzy Burch vs Keshia Green2-6, 1-6
2023-03-08vs 5-SStowe - SVCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Chaves Cerdas / Colleen Starns vs Janna Hess / Sandra Stowe6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Lizzy Burch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Destiny Lopez
published 3
2.80
Edith Becerra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Suzie Roth
published
2.48
Colleen Starns
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
published
2.38
Laura Chaves Cerdas
published
Ericka Briceno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Jarvis + Colleen Starns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Jarvis
90W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
3
Lizzy Burch
44W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Destiny Lopez
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Edith Becerra
35W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Suzie Roth
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.77
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%55%45%
2.48
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Laura Chaves Cerdas
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%81%19%
2.38
Ericka Briceno
0W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.