Teams

O'Connor Montgomery

2025 18 & Over Southern Combo Doubles - Montgomery · 6.5 Combo Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-07vs MCC Reyes 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLevani Odikadze / Habib Rehman vs John Searcy / Russell Sinco5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAntonio Echols / Kyle Mathews vs Franklin Johnson / Viktor Perovic5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Caldwell / Alexander Shipp vs Rodrigo Barragan / Brian Schroll5-7, 2-6
2025-07-24vs MCC Reyes 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesWesley Robinson / Levani Odikadze vs Carlos Reyes / Tyler Oborn5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Caldwell / Antonio Echols vs Russell Sinco / Brian Schroll3-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs MCC Reyes 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Traff / Wesley Robinson vs Marshall Long / Carlos Reyes3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHabib Rehman / Levani Odikadze vs Tyler Oborn / Brian Schroll1-6, 0-6
2025-07-17vs MCC Reyes 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesRichard Caldwell / Habib Rehman vs Carlos Reyes / Brian Schroll6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Wilkerson / Wesley Robinson vs Tyler Oborn / Russell Sinco4-6, 4-6
2025-07-10vs MCC Reyes 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Traff / Alexander Shipp vs Marshall Long / Daniel Rhyne2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Caldwell / Michael Wilkerson vs Hayden Hall / Rodrigo Barragan0-6, 1-6
2025-06-26vs MCC Reyes 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesWesley Robinson / Paul Hayes vs John Searcy / Viktor Perovic6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLevani Odikadze / Habib Rehman vs Daniel Rhyne / Hayden Hall4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAntonio Echols / Kyle Mathews vs Franklin Johnson / Russell Sinco7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Antonio Holmes
published 4
3.47
Mark DePlanche
published
3.45
Antonio Echols
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Christopher Traff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Wesley Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Jonathan Tuckwell
published
3.08
Richard Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Levani Odikadze
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Habib Rehman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Alexander Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Michael Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Hayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wesley Robinson + Levani Odikadze3350% gamesnot enough data
Levani Odikadze + Habib Rehman1536% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Mathews + Antonio Echols1544% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Tuckwell + Levani Odikadze314 matchesnot enough data
Paul Hayes + Mark DePlanche033 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Tuckwell + Alexander Shipp213 matchesnot enough data
Wesley Robinson + Antonio Echols213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antonio Holmes
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Mark DePlanche
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Antonio Echols
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Christopher Traff
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Wesley Robinson
29W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
Jonathan Tuckwell
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
Richard Caldwell
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Levani Odikadze
25W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Habib Rehman
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Alexander Shipp
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Michael Wilkerson
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kyle Mathews
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Hayes
0W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.