Teams

KR-Robinson (18s 5.5W C)

2025 Neuse River Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-15vs GCC-Greene (18s 5.5W C)Split 11
W#1 DoublesErin Robinson / Lisa Sylvia vs Rebecca Blount / Lori Wagner5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmon Jones / Dawn Rowland vs Jenny Dempsey / Kellye Roberts6-7, 4-6
2025-09-07vs GCC-Greene (18s 5.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Albritton / Megan Jones vs Mary-Marshall Greene / Courtney Steed4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Herlong / Dawn Rowland vs Lori Wagner / Kellye Roberts0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Nix / Lisa Sylvia vs Keela Blango / Valerie DeBellis1-6, 1-6
2025-09-01vs GCC-Greene (18s 5.5W C)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Herlong / Dawn Rowland vs Lori Wagner / Kellye Roberts3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Albritton / Erin Robinson vs Nicole Carlyle / Martha Whitesides4-4
2025-08-25vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies (18s 5.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRenee Herlong / Erin Robinson vs Kristi Geer / Geneva Colie3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Sylvia / Megan Jones vs Shelly Sutton / Lakisha Dawson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Nix / Meghan Pileggi vs Brenda Hardison / Rebecca Helms3-6, 3-6
2025-08-04vs GR-Colie AFD Ladies (18s 5.5W C)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Robinson / Amanda Albritton vs Lakisha Dawson / Geneva Colie6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Sylvia / Megan Jones vs Cathy Williams / Megan Pender3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDawn Rowland / Meghan Pileggi vs Shelly Sutton / Kelli Dawson2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Amanda Albritton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Carmon Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Lisa Sylvia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Dawn Rowland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Erin Robinson
published
Meghan Pileggi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Herlong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne Nix
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sylvia + Amanda Albritton224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sylvia + Renee Herlong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Albritton
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Carmon Jones
8W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lisa Sylvia
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Dawn Rowland
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Robinson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Pileggi
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Herlong
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Nix
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.