Teams

Davis - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-25vs Worley - RS ClayWon 41
W#1 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Victor Agadzi vs Collin Crowson / Campbell Esquerre6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesRick Bucco vs Auston Fillinger6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBradford Grimmel / Ryan Sellars vs Will Grace / Ryan Worley6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJack Bellah vs Matthew Meekins6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Davis / Christopher Vann vs ChanD Tegenkamp / Joseph Tegenkamp4-6, 0-6
2025-05-28vs Worley - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnthony Giberman / Jim Smith vs Xiaobo Dong / Joseph Tegenkamp3-6, 2-6
2025-05-14vs McElhany - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Smith / Mark Nissley vs Tracy Schmidt / Roman Kowalski2-6, 2-6
2025-05-12vs Worley - RS ClayLost 23
W#1 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Victor Agadzi vs George Anderson / Xiaobo Dong6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRick Bucco vs Addison van Pelt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Nissley / Bradford Grimmel vs Zach Pohlmann / Collin Crowson1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJames Davis vs Matthew Meekins4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnthony Giberman / Ethan Rhone vs Joseph Tegenkamp / ChanD Tegenkamp3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ethan Rhone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Ryan Sellars
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Victor Agadzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Jonathan Llanera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Bradford Grimmel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Rick Bucco
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Anthony Giberman
published 3
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
James Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Christopher Vann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jack Bellah
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mark Nissley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Nissley + Bradford Grimmel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Sellars
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jonathan Llanera
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Bradford Grimmel
15W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Rick Bucco
24W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Anthony Giberman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
James Davis
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Christopher Vann
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jack Bellah
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Nissley
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.