Teams

GCC/Seaver

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Women-UPTA · 2.5 Women FF

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-01vs Rally Rabbits/KrocSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Coleman / Kristen McLean vs Liz Faucher / Meg Riley2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristie Nachman vs Miller Howard6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-25vs RiverwalkLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Coleman / Kristen McLean vs Alyson Barrick / Lauren Young3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Robinson vs Jessa Shiner3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Seaver / Virginia Hayes vs Jessica McMullen / Janna Neil6-7, 4-6
2024-10-18vs UPTA18A/Manning/SouthsideWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Coleman / Caroline Giguere vs Maryn Canniff / Melissa Studebaker6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVictoria Robinson vs Ashley Rehn6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristie Nachman / Virginia Hayes vs Cady Johnson / Becca Wilson1-6, 1-6
2024-10-11vs Rackettes/GCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen McLean / Jennifer Coleman vs Holly Sellers / Lauren Barber4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Robinson vs Sarah Schipper6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Seaver / Caroline Giguere vs Lacey Morgan / Ashley Boyd7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Michelle Seaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Caroline Giguere
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Christie Nachman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Brandi Hinton
published 2.5
2.25
Victoria Robinson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.21
Velda Hughes
published
2.13
Kristen McLean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Virginia Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Hayes + Kristen McLean1436% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Coleman + Kristen McLean044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Seaver
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Caroline Giguere
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Christie Nachman
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Brandi Hinton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
Victoria Robinson
1W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.25
Velda Hughes
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.21
Kristen McLean
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Virginia Hayes
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jennifer Coleman
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.